Former referee Gianpaolo Calvarese has defended the decision to award Manchester United a penalty in their match against Roma at Old Trafford, which Gil Manzano gave at the 58th minute and which allowed United to cut the deficit. Writing in La Gazzetta dello Sport, Calvarese said: "Il rigore concesso per il contatto tra Mancini e Cunha, a mio giudizio, è leggero: Mancini cerca di evitare l'avversario." Translated: "The penalty awarded for the contact between Mancini and Cunha, in my opinion, is slight: Mancini is trying to avoid the opponent." The contact between Mancini and Cunha, if there was any, was described as very light. The spot-kick sequence then began with a save by Vásquez from Bruno Fernandes, followed by a retake after Cristante entered the box early. The result was a 1-2 scoreline, which revitalised United's players and fans and opened the way to their comeback.
Calvarese said the focus should be on what came after the save. He said: "Vásquez para il tiro di Bruno Fernandes rispettando la posizione richiesta al portiere, con un piede sulla linea. Cristante, invece, al momento della battuta ha già un piede sulla linea dell'area. E soprattutto è lui che, dopo la parata, gioca il pallone e lo allontana." Translated: "Vásquez saves Bruno Fernandes's shot while respecting the position required of the goalkeeper, with one foot on the line. Cristante, however, already had a foot on the edge of the area when the kick was taken. And above all it is he who, after the save, plays the ball and clears it away." He added that the VAR protocol applied: "L'ingresso anticipato (encroachment) può essere oggetto di intervento, perché Cristante partecipa direttamente all'azione sulla respinta. Il Var lo segnala e il rigore viene ripetuto, senza bisogno che l'arbitro vada al monitor (overrule). La decisione, dunque, è corretta, in punta di regolamento." Translated: "Early entry (encroachment) can be subject to intervention, because Cristante takes a direct part in the action on the rebound. The VAR flags it and the penalty is retaken, without the referee needing to go to the monitor (overrule). The decision, therefore, is correct, strictly according to the rules."
Calvarese then questioned whether the outcome was fair. He said: "È giusto che una parata regolare venga cancellata in una situazione del genere?" Translated: "Is it right that a regular save is cancelled in a situation like this?" He argued that both players had complied with the rules, since each kept one foot on the goal line at the moment of the kick, and that Cristante's impact on the rebound had no bearing on the duel between shooter and goalkeeper. He said: "Cristante ha certamente avuto un impatto sulla ribattuta - addirittura arriva per primo sul pallone e lo gioca -, ma quel piede sulla linea non ha inciso sul confronto tra tiratore e portiere." Translated: "Cristante certainly had an impact on the rebound, in fact he gets to the ball first and plays it, but that foot on the line did not affect the duel between shooter and goalkeeper." He backed a proposal from Pierluigi Collina for a "one shot" penalty: "Se il tiro entra, è gol. Se il portiere para, oppure il pallone colpisce un palo, o la traversa, e torna in campo, l'azione finisce e si riparte con un calcio di rinvio." Translated: "If the shot goes in, it is a goal. If the goalkeeper saves, or the ball hits a post or the crossbar and comes back into play, the action ends and play restarts with a goal kick."
Story Coverage2 sources on this story
Roma lost at Old Trafford after referee Gil Manzano awarded Manchester United a penalty in the 58th minute, which allowed United to cut the deficit. Vásquez saved Bruno Fernandes's spot-kick, but the penalty was retaken after Bryan Cristante entered the box early. Forza Roma gives the scoreline as 1-2, while GialloRossi.net describes a 2-1 defeat, a difference in wording over the same result.
Former referee Gianpaolo Calvarese, writing in La Gazzetta dello Sport, defended the original award, calling the contact between Mancini and Cunha slight, with Mancini trying to avoid his opponent. He said the retake was correct under the VAR protocol because Cristante had a foot on the line and then played the rebound. Calvarese also questioned whether it was right to cancel a regular save, arguing that Cristante's early entry did not affect the duel between shooter and goalkeeper. He backed Pierluigi Collina's proposal for a "one shot" penalty, in which a save or a rebound off the woodwork would end the action with a goal kick.
GialloRossi.net reports that Cristante said Roma must work out where they are going wrong after conceding another second-half comeback. Its coverage of the penalty is limited in the material available, so the debate over the decision rests mainly on Calvarese's comments.
AI synthesis of all sources below — always check the originals.
Testo Originale / Source Text
“Sta facendo discutere, nonostante siano ormai passate ore, la decisione dell'arbitro Gil Manzano di assegnare il calcio di rigore che, al 58', ha consentito al Manchester United di accorciare le distanze ieri sera contro la Roma all'Old Trafford. Il contatto Mancini-Cunha, se c'è, è davvero…”
Read the full article in Italian at Forza Roma.