UEFA's verdict on Roma's settlement agreement will not arrive in November, as had been expected in recent weeks, and the definitive decision will not come until May 2027, according to Corriere della Sera, which outlines the procedure under Financial Fair Play and its possible consequences for the January transfer window.
The process is longer than anticipated. On 15 October, all clubs sent UEFA their accounts closed at 30 June 2026. The examination of the documents will only begin in the final decade of November in Nyon. Even if Roma were among the first clubs analysed, any proceedings would not be opened before December or January, which is why the final decision is expected to take until late spring.
The review will cover several elements: the accounts closed on 30 June, the summer transfer operations considered under the particular tolerance granted in World Cup year, and the club's overall squad cost. This last parameter is particularly important, because UEFA rules require wages, amortisation and other costs linked to the squad to remain within a set percentage of club revenues.
So what changes for January? The postponement of the verdict does not bring any immediate new restrictions, but it does not free Roma from existing economic constraints either. The club remains within the settlement agreement and must continue to meet financial sustainability parameters. There will therefore be no ruling in November that directly changes D'Amico's investment possibilities.
The indirect consequences could still be felt. The ownership will have to take future UEFA checks into account when setting the January budget. Significant investment, especially on wage bills and squad costs, could affect later financial parameters. This is also why Roma continue to weigh carefully formulas such as the loan with an obligation to buy, while not being able to consider these operations automatically free of effects on the accounts.
Gasperini and D'Amico are therefore waiting for guidance from the ownership to establish what margins they will have available. The May decision will not prevent Roma from operating in January, but the club will still have to choose how much and how to invest. The issue is not only waiting for Nyon's judgement: it is planning the transfer market without compromising the path of financial recovery.
The verdict is therefore postponed to May, but the choices for January remain entirely to be made. Gasperini is waiting for reinforcements to keep chasing the top positions, while D'Amico has already identified several targets. What is needed above all now is a decision from the Friedkins on the resources to make available, regardless of the timing of the UEFA ruling.
Story Coverage2 sources on this story
Corriere della Sera, as reported by GialloRossi.net, says UEFA's verdict on Roma's settlement agreement under Financial Fair Play will not come in November as expected but in May 2027. Clubs sent their accounts closed at 30 June 2026 to UEFA on 15 October, and the examination in Nyon begins only in the final decade of November, so proceedings would not open before December or January. The review covers the June accounts, summer transfers made under the tolerance granted in a World Cup year, and squad costs measured against revenues. The postponement brings no immediate new restrictions, but Roma remain bound by the settlement. GialloRossi.net adds that the ownership must factor future checks into the January budget, and that Gasperini and D'Amico are awaiting guidance from the Friedkins on available resources.
Separately, Retesport, citing an interview Kostas Manolas gave to Betarades, reports that the former defender called Francesco Totti the best person he knew in football and said Totti should stay inside the club. Manolas also said the club, not Totti, ended his career and called Luciano Spalletti a great but difficult coach. He claimed Spalletti blocked a move to Arsenal.
On his 2019 departure, Manolas told Betarades that Roma needed money for Financial Fair Play and that he chose Napoli after Zenit offered 7 million on signing, a figure he framed as proof he was not simply chasing money. He said the Zenit deal collapsed over rouble-denominated contract figures. Retesport reports no conflicting accounts from other outlets.
AI synthesis of all sources below — always check the originals.