Former Roma defender Kostas Manolas has said that VAR would have taken Roma to the final, in a long interview with the Greek portal Betarades. Speaking about his time in the giallorosso, he covered Francesco Totti, Luciano Spalletti, the comeback against Barcelona and the semi-final defeat to Liverpool.
Manolas described Totti as the best person he had met in football. “He is the best person, the most humble. I cannot say a single negative word about him. Before being a footballer he is a man. He welcomed me as if I were his son. That is why we have always been very close. Even today we talk on the phone. He knew what to do with the ball an hour before it arrived. There was an enormous difference between him and all of us, technically and mentally.” Manolas said Totti helped persuade him to renew his contract: “If it had not been for him, I would not have renewed. He convinced me. He was like a brother to me, and I could not say no to him.” He added: “Totti should be inside Roma. It is not possible that he is outside. If I were the president, I would keep him for life, in the role he wants.”
On Totti's retirement, Manolas said: “I was crying too. You could not do otherwise. I had lived it in the last days and I saw how he was facing the situation. He did not want to stop. It was the club that made him stop. The club, the coach, Spalletti... Totti wanted to keep playing. In my opinion he still had something to give. Maybe he was no longer in his best physical condition, but even in recent times he came on and scored. In those 15, 20 or 30 minutes he always managed to do something, an assist or a goal.”
On Spalletti, he was blunt: “He is a very, very, very good coach. As a person, however, he is difficult. In my view he does not treat players correctly. But as a coach he is one of the best I have ever had, if not the best. I tell the truth. Just because he did not behave well with me, I cannot say he was a bad coach. He was a great coach. If I said the opposite I would be a liar.”
Manolas also spoke about the collapsed move to Zenit. He said the contract figures had first been drawn up in roubles, and that he insisted on euros because the rouble could move by as much as 20%. He said he was told he was the only player who wanted this, and that the club later agreed to euros, but by then he said it was too late.
On his return to Roma, he recalled being told he would no longer play. “I replied that it was not a problem, that we would have a coffee and in the end we would see who would play.”
He reflected on the Barcelona match and the goal he scored. “Not all bad things come to harm. That is what has stayed in history. I could have earned 10 million in one year, but I stayed at Roma for less than a third of that. What I did for myself is worth ten times as much.” On why he left, he said: “I had no patience. My cycle at Roma had closed. Five years, and I saw the team could not take that extra step to really compete. We had tried to win the league, but we lost it to Juventus, who were very strong then.” He said Napoli had higher standards at that time, adding: “I did not want to leave Italy... So I decided to go to Napoli.” He also said the club needed the money because of a major financial fair play problem: “Roma had to take that money.”
Before the Barcelona game, he recalled a team table where De Rossi, Kolarov, Džeko, Pellegrini and others predicted a 3-0 win. “I looked at them and said: ‘You are crazy! How can we win 3-0? Do you really think we will not even concede a goal to these lot? What you are saying does not exist. It is all nonsense. Today we will take three or four more and go home.’” He described his goal: “I very rarely went to the near post. But I had seen Ünder in training and knew he often shot hard without getting past the first man. So I went to the near post. I headed it, the ball did what it had to do and went in. I do not even know how to explain it.”
On the semi-final against Liverpool, Manolas said he had a bad dream before the trip: “I had the worst dream I could have in my life. I dreamed a tooth fell out. I believe in these things. When I had that dream, I understood it would be a very difficult day. One or two of their goals were offside, but we were very poor. I was very poor too. That was one of my worst Champions League games. I was really terrible.”
He was most frustrated by the second leg. “We should have won. El Shaarawy shoots and Alexander-Arnold pushes the ball away with his hand before it crosses the line. It is a penalty and a red card. We could have made it 3-2 in the 55th minute and turned the game around. Then there was another incident: a penalty not given for an offside that does not exist. There is no offside. If there had been VAR, we would have reached the final. We had come back against Barcelona and we would have come back against Liverpool too.”
Story Coverage2 sources on this story
Former Roma defender Kostas Manolas has given a long interview to a Greek portal, which Roma News calls Betardes and Forza Roma calls Betarades, in which he claimed that VAR would have sent Roma to the Champions League final. He discussed Francesco Totti, Luciano Spalletti, the 2017/18 quarter-final comeback against Barcelona and the semi-final defeat to Liverpool. Manolas said Totti helped convince him to renew his contract and should stay at the club, and that Totti's retirement was the club's decision rather than his own. On Spalletti, he said the coach was one of the best he had worked with but difficult as a person.
Manolas recalled that before the second leg against Barcelona, Roma trailed 4-1 and several players, including De Rossi, Kolarov, Džeko and Pellegrini, predicted a 3-0 win. He said he scored the decisive goal by heading in a corner from Cengiz Ünder at the near post. For Liverpool, he said he had a bad dream before the first leg and played poorly. Both outlets report his anger over the second leg: he said El Shaarawy's shot was handled by Alexander-Arnold, which should have been a penalty and a red card, and that a Roma penalty was denied for an offside that did not exist.
Roma News adds further details. It reports that a move to Zenit collapsed over contract currency, with Manolas refusing roubles, and that he later left Roma for Napoli because the club needed the money to deal with a financial fair play problem. Roma News also reports that he said he had been told he would no longer play on his return to Rome. Forza Roma gives a similar account of the Zenit talks but does not include the financial fair play reasoning.
AI synthesis of all sources below — always check the originals.